| ||
Sat 2024-12-21
Fri 2024-12-20
Thu 2024-12-19
Wed 2024-12-18
hydroxychloroquine fraud withdrawn Tue 2024-12-17
Sun 2024-12-15
Sat 2024-12-14
Fri 2024-12-13
Thu 2024-12-12
Tue 2024-12-10
Search
Archives
2023
12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
One good site
MDN
Nelson Minar
Blog licensed under a Creative Commons License
|
Amazon's new Elastic
compute cloud looks good. So many signups they've closed the
beta for now. Between EC2 for compute and
S3 for storage,
Amazon is offering most of a utility computing service. Store and process
data for very cheap, pay as you go. As a developer who recently lost access
to a massive compute farm I find these Amazon services very exciting.
Think of the startups it could enable!
But as the founder of a failed utility computing company I just don't get how Amazon's going to benefit from offering these services. The problem is the commodity pricing. If Amazon completely sells a server they gross about $900 a year. Say it costs $300 / year to buy and run a server and they fully sell out 10,000 machines, then Amazon nets $6M / year. Amazon made $360M last year, so this best case scenario would be a 2% earnings improvement. Nice, but worth the distraction to their primary business? I love that Amazon is offering this service; it seems very valuable and useful to people like me. But unless it's a long term viable business for Amazon it'd be foolish to build a product that relies on their service. I guess we'll see how it plays out. Sun's version of this was looking really bad last year, but then again the signup process at Sun is 1000 times harder. Thanks to waxy for
some chat on this question
|
|
