| ||
Sat 2024-12-21
Fri 2024-12-20
Thu 2024-12-19
Wed 2024-12-18
hydroxychloroquine fraud withdrawn Tue 2024-12-17
Sun 2024-12-15
Sat 2024-12-14
Fri 2024-12-13
Thu 2024-12-12
Tue 2024-12-10
Search
Archives
2023
12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
One good site
MDN
Nelson Minar
Blog licensed under a Creative Commons License
|
The SF Chron has an
article
about Iraqi casualties, first I've seen in mainstream US media.
But Herold said the precision and power of today's U.S. munitions
don't translate into lower civilian casualties, especially when a war
involves urban targets, as in Iraq. ...
"Even if these bombs hit their targets, you'll kill civilians nearby,"
he said.
The article goes on to reference
iraqbodycount.net, a site
that estimates civilian casualties by reading news reports.
I've been pulling their data myself - it's the big number on my
sidebar. They have a clever Javascript image compositing system
for you to embed in your site. (The image here is static.)
We've killed around 2500 Iraqi civilians. That's roughly World Trade Center numbers. No one has an estimate of how many soldiers we killed. Given that we've liberated Iraq, shouldn't we care about the dead soldiers? They were victims as well. The US is deeply into the arrogance of power. It's wonderful that only 132 Americans have died in this war. But it is dangerous that our power is so disproportionate. We lash out across the globe without feeling consequence. The rest of the world is horrified at our violence, and in the US we are ignorant. |
|
